Comments for Tactical Machining

Comment on ATF Determination Update by junior

junior — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:19:21 +0000

The selector detent will continue to be drilled

Comment on ATF Determination Update by Craig

Craig — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:40:04 +0000

Will you continue to drill the selector detent hole? This was one of items that I found worth waiting for you to have 80%s in stock instead of buying from someone else.

Comment on ATF Determination Update by junior

junior — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:09:48 +0000

Unfortunately we do not have any AR-15 style 80% lower receivers with the selector hole drilled… we sold out of them just recently. Anything sent in the future will have the safety selector emitted…. We do have a few 80% .308 Lowers with the selector hole drilled however…

Comment on ATF Determination Update by NathanJM

NathanJM — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:02:52 +0000

How many receivers with the selector hole drilled do you have in stock? Any without the magwell broached?

Comment on ATF Determination Update by Darin

Darin — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:17:08 +0000

I have noticed on your competitors lowers that they don’t include the safety selector hole, but also start the hole/slot for the rear take down lug on the upper. So are your competitors going to be told not to due this, “unfair advantage” on their lowers??? I agree with Mark on this one.

Comment on ATF Determination Update by Mark P

Mark P — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:15:05 +0000

Dear TM,

I understand that you won’t likely be able to fight the ATF on the 80% lowers decision through legal means, but since when have they been the arbiters of fairness in the market place. They came to the conclusion that your components were NOT receivers and now without legitimate reason they have chosen to reclassify them. This seems fundamentally wrong, let your competition figure it out, it’s not the ATF’s job to level the playing field. While I am sure that it is not in your interest to fight the ATF on this, you should call them on it and perhaps ask your congressman and senator to intervene on what is clearly a decision that is based on criteria that the ATF should not be using in the evaluation of what is or is not a receiver. I sincerely hope that you do contact your legislators, as this will impact your ability to contribute to the economic recovery and your ability to compete fairly in the marketplace with an innovative product. It is not your fault that your competitors did not submit a sample that included the safety selector.

Respectfully,

Mark

Comment on 80% Lower Receivers back in stock! by junior

junior — Fri, 28 May 2010 10:17:22 +0000

I can’t thank you enough for the comment. I do appreciate hearing good feedback. We try really hard to make sure everything that comes out our door is of the highest quality. Thank you very much! Good luck with your 80% projects !

Comment on 80% Lower Receivers back in stock! by L.A. Jones - Audit Service

L.A. Jones - Audit Service — Fri, 28 May 2010 03:16:46 +0000

I have ruined a few , come close with a few more, and even approached success. This 80% lower has made me a success where I couldn’t even begin before. Other lowers from other websites I tried seemed to have no firm index point. Looked to me like no one thought about how the guy on the other end of the mail would proceed. This lower , however, is of a quality that is not often seen at this price.Square is square and flat is flat. easy to find your way. the work that is done already for you is as perfect as you could want. the work to be done can be located easily. i can’t thank you enough for thr thought that went into this product. You have made me look good and I certainly appreciate that. I will tell all and any that will listen about your fine 80% lower.

Comment on 80% Lowers by Barry Williams

Barry Williams — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:29:37 +0000

I am interested in 80% lowers

Comment on Chrome Lined Barrels $199 by junior

junior — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:56:22 +0000

16″ no front sight tower